Photo taken from one of the many pedestrian bridges next to Eagle’s Bridge in Sofia.

Cats, good books, AI, and religious walking in the city of Sofia
Photo taken from one of the many pedestrian bridges next to Eagle’s Bridge in Sofia.

Viktor Larenz is a psychiatrist, whose twelve-year-old daughter, Josy, got sick and either disappeared or died in a very obscure scene.
One thing is very clear from the start, Viktor Lanetz sees things nobody else sees. The main mystery of the book is what is hallucination and what is real. My guess, after 20-30 pages read, was that 100% of all non-Viktor characters are hallucinations. This is what the author implies. However, this book has 4.1 on Goodreads, and I’m sure that 90% of the readers made the same guess and wouldn’t have rated it 4.1 if it was that simple.
On top of that, the tagline, what happened with Josy, turns out to also be quite mysterious, and it will be solved.
This is not a realistic book. It’s dark noir, made-up, annoying, with plot twists designed to play with your mind. It has the vibe of Sucker Punch, if you remember that movie, and The Poison Artist by Jonathan Moore. However, it’s not quite up to that bar, just leaning that way from a close distance.
I rated it 3/5 on Goodreads because for the most of the book, it felt too obvious. The stuff that wasn’t obvious felt too made up. However, the Goodreads audience disagrees and rated this over 4, which is pretty high. In general, my interpretation for Goodreads ratings is as follows:
This book is well within the readable range and it is not bad but I didn’t like it. I will, however, try another book by the same author, this time with adjusted expectations. Hopefully, I’ll like the next one more.

I had a good month, completed some great books that are easy to recommend.
Just yesterday, I shared about a popular science book about Bayes. Today I started a new one, called Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments: A Practical Guide to A/B Testing. I picked it because I want to learn more about the industry standard way of doing controlled experiments, an area where I have some experience. This particular book started well.
Even the first chapters show that the authors do have experience I can relate to and can, hopefully, learn from.
This quote, for example, is included in their preface:
Any figure that looks interesting or different is usually wrong
It matches my experience with overly positive results or ambitious claims in analysis. Can’t tell you how many times I’ve fallen into the trap of believing something wins big time while there was really just a mistake, or a bias of some kind, twisting the results. But I had no clue someone postulated a law on it and got a Wikipedia page about it. I can now cite it and gain mana points 😀
So, I have a good feeling about this book and I hope to be able to complete it much faster than the last one. It just starts well.

Unfortunately, my copy arrived with significant damage. It was improperly packaged and delivered poorly. However, it is a book I read with a pen, underlining what I think is important, and leaving notes inside, so it will not get any better anyway.
A group of nerds is either brought together at the FBI to solve its toughest cases or to fail together because they suck. The lead nerd also happens to be the protagonist. I already don’t remember his name but he’s the type of person who would count things or spot things nobody else does.
The promise of watching a team of nerds solve a big mystery is delivered. The mystery is medium level difficulty but involves multiple serial killers. The main villain is something of a Dexter Morgan type. He clearly knows far too much to not be FBI, at the same time may also be a nerd himself. FBI people wouldn’t enjoy being investigated as suspects.
If you don’t like tropes, this book would not be for you. For me, it was a satisfying read that I’d rate around 4.5*/5. Not very original or anything, just satisfying.
